An
organizational structure consists of activities such as task allocation,
coordination and supervision, which are directed towards the achievement of
organizational aims. It can also be considered as the viewing glass or
perspective through which individuals see their organization and its
environment.
Organizational
structure affects organizational action in two big ways.
a)
Provides the foundation on which standard operating procedures and routines
rest.
b)
Determines which individuals get to participate in which decision-making
processes, and thus to what extent their views shape the organization’s
actions.
The
set organizational structure may not coincide with facts, evolving in
operational action. Such divergence decreases performance, when growing. E.g.,
a wrong organizational structure may hamper cooperation and thus hinder the
completion of orders in due time and within limits of resources and budgets.
Organizational structures shall be adaptive to process requirements, aiming to
optimize the ratio of effort and input to output.
TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURES
This type
of organizational structure:
For example: As shown, the organization is divided by functions into different
departments like sales, finance, engineering, HR. A sales manager would be
responsible for the sale of all the products which are manufactured by the
firm.
Ø
This leads to operational efficiencies within that
group. However it could also lead to a lack of communication between the
functional groups within an organization, making the organization slow and
inflexible.
Ø
Mainly used by the smaller firms that offer a
limited line of products.
Ø
Makes supervision easier as each manager must be
expert in only a narrow range of skills. It also helps to group a particular
set of people with the specialized kind of skill set.
Ø
But as the organization grow and diversify, some of
the problems begin to surface:
§ As each
department functional managers need to report to central headquarters (President),
it can be difficult to make quick decisions.
§ Harder to judge performance because which
department to blame when a new product fails.
§ Difficult to coordinate the functions of
members of the entire organization as each department may have difficulty
working with other departments in a unified way to achieve organizational
goals.
Ø
Brings together in one work unit all those involved
in the production and marketing of a product or a related group of products, all
those in a certain geographic area, or all those dealing with a certain type of
customer.
Ø Can follow
three patterns as described below:
- DIVISION BY PRODUCT
As shown
the categorization (division) has been done on the basis of broad category of
products. And each category of related group of products has its own marketing,
sales, purchasing and inventory manager.
- DIVISION BY GEOGRAPHY
Geographical
organization is logical when a plant must be located as close as possible to
sources of raw materials, to major markets, or to specialized personnel.
- DIVISION BY CUSTOMER
c) Matrix Organization/ Multiple Command System
Ø
Employees have in effect 2 bosses i.e. 2 chains of
command. One chain of command is functional or divisional and the second is a
horizontal overlay that combines people from various divisions or functional
departments into a project or business team led by a project or group manager
who is an expert in the team's assigned area of specialization.
Ø
For example, many large companies have a corporate
human resources division, with individual HR representatives stationed at local
facilities. At the local level, the HR representative may report to the
operations manager charged with responsibility for that facility. However, the
operations manger does not likely have specific expertise in human resource
management and is not directly involved in setting corporate HR initiatives.
For that reason, the HR representative may also report to a corporate HR
manager or director, resulting is a matrix structure
Ø
Bring
together the diverse specialized skills required to solve a complex problem.
Ø
Problems of coordination are minimized here because
the most important personnel for a project work together as a group. They come
to understand the demands faced by those who have different areas of
responsibility.
Ø
Gives the organization a great deal of cost-saving
flexibility because each project is assigned only to the required people and
unnecessary duplication is avoided.
Ø To be
effective, team members must have good interpersonal skills and flexibility and
cooperation.
In
addition to defining the reporting structure, businesses structures can also be
described in terms of whether the organization is tall or flat. This
characteristic refers to how many layers of management there are in an organization.
A tall organization is quite hierarchical, with several different levels of management. Individual managers have a narrow span of control, with a relatively small number of employees in their direct reporting line. Decision making tends to be centralized with management in tall organizations.
A flat organization is one where there are relatively few levels of management. Supervisory employees tend to have a wide span of control, which means they are likely to have a relatively large number of direct reports. Decision making is less centralized, with employees being empowered to exercise discretion in their work and having an opportunity to participate in much of the decision making that takes place.
A tall organization is quite hierarchical, with several different levels of management. Individual managers have a narrow span of control, with a relatively small number of employees in their direct reporting line. Decision making tends to be centralized with management in tall organizations.
A flat organization is one where there are relatively few levels of management. Supervisory employees tend to have a wide span of control, which means they are likely to have a relatively large number of direct reports. Decision making is less centralized, with employees being empowered to exercise discretion in their work and having an opportunity to participate in much of the decision making that takes place.
Choosing an Organizational Structure
Choosing
among the types of business organizational structures is a big decision that
should not be taken lightly. It's important to look an organization's size,
number of facilities located in different geographic areas, marketing strategy,
business philosophy, and other factors when making this decision. Regardless of
the type of structure you choose, it's important to clearly communicate
expectations to employees at all levels, making sure that each member of the
team is clear about his or her reporting lines.
No comments:
Post a Comment